11-19-2016, 04:03 PM
(11-19-2016, 02:47 PM)panamaniac Wrote:(11-19-2016, 01:53 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: What bugs me about this response is that it's untrue. East Ave. is not a parallel road, nor does it continue as far south as Weber.
Equivalent parallel roads would be King, Charles, Courtland, all of which have been or are being rebuilt, and none of them are getting bike infrastructure.
Is it just me - I'm not seeing "parallel" in the Project Team Response.
Yes, my mistake, they said "adjacent"...but East is also not really adjacent. The point is, East is not really an alternate route for Weber. The real alternate routes are Charles, Courtland, and King, none of which have planned infra.
East diverges from Weber and heads north, then ends at Frederick.