11-19-2016, 10:24 PM
(11-19-2016, 01:53 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: What bugs me about this response is that it's untrue. East Ave. is not a parallel road, nor does it continue as far south as Weber.
Equivalent parallel roads would be King, Charles, Courtland, all of which have been or are being rebuilt, and none of them are getting bike infrastructure.
I think King (from Cedar to Ottawa or so, at least) would be the best alternative. It's central, there is available width, and the traffic volumes are far smaller than on Weber. If we push for an East-West cycling route, that would be the one to push for.
Charles is constrained by the LRT and Courtland has a fair bit of traffic as well.
Are either King or Charles due to get sharrows? I think at least on Charles they should work fairly well. Or would investing further in the IHT be the best option in the end?