05-19-2017, 06:53 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2017, 06:53 PM by danbrotherston.)
I don't believe the original report made any recommendation regarding Guelph, I believe it gave through, and bypass as options, and said more study was needed.
As for the route, the train you're running on is probably 300+ km/h? And the original study was for that as well. This route is planned to be only 250 km/h. Which makes closer stops more feasible.
As for the route, the train you're running on is probably 300+ km/h? And the original study was for that as well. This route is planned to be only 250 km/h. Which makes closer stops more feasible.