04-09-2015, 11:53 AM
(04-09-2015, 11:25 AM)schooner77 Wrote: \As for the agenda of the safety association in question, they aren't supposed to balance anything other than safety, I would hope. It is the responsibility of council to act or not act on their recommendations.
Sorry, but they are supposed to consider competing interests. It would be even safer to enclose the entire route inside a safety vault. That way no one could ever collide with the LRT.
Quote: None of your links show a reasonable equivalence to this circumstance. Each link represents a dedicated transportation route, close to traffic.
Each of the links I sent has a walking path next to it. That was the criteria used to select them.
Quote:This however, is a park, with children, and a lot of distractions.
Ah, the good old "think of the children" which is always brought up when people propose over reaching regulations. Let me be very clear. I agree an enclosure is needed. I have yet to see an argument that a six foot chain fence is not an overkill.