01-31-2019, 10:53 PM
(01-31-2019, 10:11 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: The entrances to 20, 24, 26, and 30 are around back and require an excessive walk from the entrance and from the parking lot. They should be re-arranged to be more like the entrances to 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18. Also the City should extend the sidewalk from the southeast at least across the entire front of the development.
The pathway seems to indicate those units are on a grade, so a side entrance might be a challenge.
But the back walkway could connect directly to the sidewalk instead of requiring residents to walk up the hill the parking lot, but the lack of smart sidewalk connections is par for the course even in places where there are sidewalks.

