05-08-2019, 11:38 AM
(05-08-2019, 10:48 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: since you've decided you're right, and that if you cannot eliminate all risk, then we have nothing to learn and there's no point in prioritizing reducing harm at all...
Lol, this was never even close to the argument I was making. And of course you were the one arguing the absolute.
(05-08-2019, 10:48 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: Lemme know though, which of your family members you think are worth sacrificing to get somewhere slightly faster?
I can’t roll my eyes enough at this. This is why probability and things like expected value need to be taught more in schools.
Let me put it this way, I happily drive my family on the 401 instead of taking slower backroads because even though the backroads would be safer I value the convenience more than the extra safety the backroads would give me.
Sometimes though, I might forgo driving in the 401 or other expressways in favour of safer but slower alternatives. Like if it’s freezing rain or blowing heavy snow at night I’d prefer risking slower accidents on city streets than taking the expressway.

