12-18-2019, 10:50 PM
(12-14-2019, 05:56 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:Well I am glad your not chief city planner then. Haha in all seriousness king is a bit mess. Hopefully as new buildings go up along king they can cover up some of the awful EIFS towers of the past 2 decades.(12-14-2019, 02:07 PM)westwardloo Wrote: I have a feeling they are referring to the buildings along king, especially the disaster at king and Columbia. I would also add all the awful 5 story builds scattered all over the university area before the high rises began
https://www.google.ca/maps/place/63-53+C...cd93?hl=en
I actually really like the ones they built at Albert and university. Too bad they weren't all that quality.
OK, yeah, King St. isn’t looking so great. Quality varies a lot.
Personally, and I know I’m beating a bit of a dead horse here (see the Market Square thread), but I’m more annoyed by the practical fact that even with skyscrapers going up all over the place there isn’t even the beginning of an attempt at parts of a weather-protected route from UW to WLU. All it would take is a few large buildings along University Ave. to link to each other and this could exist, which would make travel so much more convenient for thousands of students every day.
If I were chief city planner, the rule would be medium density implies covered porticos linked all the way around each block; high density implies fully enclosed links between all buildings.