02-16-2021, 12:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-16-2021, 12:41 PM by danbrotherston.)
(02-16-2021, 12:15 PM)ac3r Wrote: ...illegal? Why? Of course they'll need to grow, but they'll look like that one day. It would be odd to release renderings of what a building site would look like immediately post-construction. Would you want the renders to have no grass and patches of gravel instead?
I think the misrepresentation being referred to is showing a four lane high speed highway which has killed several people at this location as a small inoffensive residential street with more pedestrians than cars.
This is what I might WANT, but it is certainly not what exists, and the city's policy will not create that in the future.
That being said, I'm not sure how you legislate this, it's a graphic image, none of it exactly matches reality, so of course it's going to show the development in the best light. Anyone who buys a property without even visiting the site on google maps I dunno...whatever...I know it's a missrepresentation, but it's not a hard to see through.