04-12-2021, 09:44 AM
(04-12-2021, 08:42 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: For bonus point, the art is done in the style of a local activist artist, but who did not actually get to do the work (and if she was asked, she would have explained why it was a bad idea), in fact, nobody knows who did the work, or how much they were paid.
I didn’t even think about the art contract. This actually raises a pretty significant point on its own, entirely separate from all the other issues you’ve raised: shouldn’t they be proud of whom they chose to do the artwork? And I don’t really care if the amount paid is part of the press release, but it absolutely should be available to the public by looking in a financial transparency report somewhere.
Of course if the art was done by a white guy whose family roots extend to when the Angles met the Saxons …