05-11-2021, 10:18 PM
I'm OK with the split tracks.
The station access was not fully thought out, and could have been done much better at some stations (some others are fine). The incremental cost would not have been much.
Traynor was missed, probably because the planners were only looking at the official roads and trails. And possibly no one brought up the Traynor access in the public meetings.
We should have consistent LRT priority for traffic lights, but that might have been politically unpalatable at the time. I'm OK if it gets done in the next few years, as the LRT usage increases.
The station access was not fully thought out, and could have been done much better at some stations (some others are fine). The incremental cost would not have been much.
Traynor was missed, probably because the planners were only looking at the official roads and trails. And possibly no one brought up the Traynor access in the public meetings.
We should have consistent LRT priority for traffic lights, but that might have been politically unpalatable at the time. I'm OK if it gets done in the next few years, as the LRT usage increases.

