06-28-2021, 09:27 AM
(06-28-2021, 08:30 AM)jamincan Wrote: Notably, it does not say "a partnership between the MTO, municipalities, and Northfield Properties LP & Northfield Properties (GP) Inc.", which I cynically interpret as "we want you to approve this subdivision within the context of a pedestrian link existing, because otherwise the plan has a much higher likelihood of not being approved, but any pedestrian link is your own responsibility. Good luck working with the MTO and scrounging up the funds for it, lol!"
Good catch. The bridge should either be deleted from the plan entirely and it considered on that basis or the whole rezoning be contingent on the bridge happening (not saying government shouldn’t help with the bridge, but the development shouldn’t proceed without it; enough vapour promises already).