Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Victoria and Park | 25, 36, 38 fl | Proposed
#59
(11-01-2021, 09:18 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: They might occasionally measure how many people cross a road, but usually only to justify why they don't want to put in a crossing.

Ah yes, I remember a crossing of Erb at Albert being rejected because “nobody crosses” there. Hmmm, I wonder why that might be? Maybe because there isn’t a safe crossing? Funny how that criterion never gets applied to road bridges over the river… What’s that saying, “sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice”?
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: Victoria and Park | 25, 36, 38 fl | Proposed - by ijmorlan - 11-02-2021, 09:22 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links