02-08-2022, 11:28 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-08-2022, 11:29 PM by cherrypark.)
Meeting tonight was pretty civil by comparison to the delegates for 660 Belmont, minus one pretty loaded question on "whats in it for you" towards the developer. A lot of checking GSP's work on the shadows from 3-4 concerned citizens that had done their own sketch-up models, which was definitely not something I expected to hear more than once.
I think this proposal is really solid and hope the debate on height and shadows peters off. Did seem that Eric's comments on forthcoming zoning changes stifled a bit of the stick to the plan angle. This group felt more earnest in the quality and attention to the building impact than similar presentations from others downtown (thinking of IN8/SRM).
I think this proposal is really solid and hope the debate on height and shadows peters off. Did seem that Eric's comments on forthcoming zoning changes stifled a bit of the stick to the plan angle. This group felt more earnest in the quality and attention to the building impact than similar presentations from others downtown (thinking of IN8/SRM).