Posts: 4,593
Threads: 16
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
147
Yeah, the tunnel was out of scope for the LRT project and they didn't want to include a change order.
This let GrandLinq put in the TPSS however they want, and the Region shot itself in the foot.
Posts: 4,936
Threads: 155
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
128
If they cheap out on this and it's anything less than a show stopper I will be SO DAMN PISSED
Posts: 4,936
Threads: 155
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
128
Continuing to think about this:
If they do have to close Duke, I hope they incorporate Duke Street from the tracks to Victoria into the project and have it feel like one continuous space. I see no need for the little stub of Duke to be there unless it's purely for development/parking entrances.
I love that Matt Rodrigues mentions a pedestrian scramble here. I think it's well suited. I've always been a fan of his stuff on Twitter. Matt, if you're a user on here, well done my friend!
I really hope the design of the hub is planned that future phases can/will integrate with it. I really don't want this to feel out of place once the development starts.
It just felt like everything was more integrated in previous designs. The bus stops, the drop off, everything felt as one. This does not. And maybe that's just the unfortunate reality of not being able to do it all as one project.
Posts: 912
Threads: 13
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation:
92
Agree 100% with spokes this need to be a show stopper for the region. Personally I feel like the rough preliminary design looks like a cheap suburban community centre. This is our main transportation hub. Think bold, think grand and if it's not feasible yet. Wait another year or two and have someone spectacular. As long as this is on it's way for 2025 when all day two-way go happens we are in good shape. No need to rush a sub-par design.
Also the little bus loop seems dysfunctional and way more present than in the previous design.
Posts: 6,686
Threads: 38
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
117
I suspect that expecting anything that includes the word "show" is setting oneself up for disappointment. Like, ION, this will likely be a bare bones facility.
Posts: 4,300
Threads: 65
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation:
249
This new design could not be more underwhelming.
Posts: 4,593
Threads: 16
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
147
Now THAT's transit-oriented development.
Posts: 7,987
Threads: 39
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
213
Lol, it certainly has no lack of ambition. I don't know though, it looks like one of those 1960 futuristic tower in the park concepts, except with trains instead of a freeway. They didn't usually turn out that well...but the picture doesn't really give any actual details.
Posts: 1,838
Threads: 3
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
161
They could do a similar approach here. Have the transit building tie into Google. The Google employees would enjoy that !
Posts: 10,807
Threads: 67
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
385
We had nice renders for the transit hub before, too. Anyone can do a render. It doesn't mean that it'll get built.