12-03-2015, 03:59 PM
(12-03-2015, 11:43 AM)Viewfromthe42 Wrote: Is anyone else a bit insulted that the development is named after the spur line, but not only does the rendering show zero pedestrian way into the development (only the Erb-mandated sidewalk), but there is zero evidence of the namesake trail, or accommodation for those who would bike to this development on it?
I too noticed that the Laurel Trail which runs along the property line is completely absent from the rendering. So is Laurel Creek itself. (If I was looking at renting space in this development I'd consider both of those as positive features.)