Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 16 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit
Is that where all (including our LRVs) welding is done for Bombardier?
Reply


Yes. However Bead Ross (TTC) confirmed that was actually re-stating the news from last fall, not new news. So disregard. Smile
Reply
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best Smile
Reply
Underpromise and over-deliver!
Reply
(01-19-2016, 05:35 PM)Canard Wrote: Underpromise and over-deliver!

Hmm, seems they’ve got this backwards!

By the way, I’ve been meaning to thank you for asking Bombardier on Twitter about the LRVs. I have not been surprised to see no response from them, but you’re still right to ask the question. It really seems like a quick response wouldn’t tax their staff too much. Unless they’re too busy drafting the next excuse for delay on the Toronto order.
Reply
The rather detailed discussion of all different kinds of LRVs was getting a little off topic, and has been split into its own thread so that discussion can flourish on its own!
Light Rail Vehicles - LRT, ICTS, Monorail, and more
Reply
Construction progresses on the temporary shelter.

   

   

   
Reply


I know that's the temporary dome, but wouldn't King-Victoria Terminal look gorgeous with a cylindrical station covering?
Reply
(01-20-2016, 10:33 PM)DKsan Wrote: I know that's the temporary dome, but wouldn't King-Victoria Terminal look gorgeous with a cylindrical station covering?

YES.  Driving up King Street today, I thought the dome shape looked really nice there.
Reply
It's part of the artist's concepts; if we lobby enough at the next public information sessions it might become reality.
Reply
The ION facebook page has me thinking about how RT might evolve in the region. I think the next step I would like to see is a bit more of a regional rail system, probably using DMUs on mostly existing tracks.

First line would use the existing tracks between New Hamburg and Guelph with stops at New Hamburg, Baden, Boardwalk, Belmont, King&Vic, Lancaster, River, Lackner, Breslau, Imperial Rd, Guelph Stn, Victoria Rd.

Frequency 15 min peak periods, dropping down to 30-60 min off-peak.
Reply
I would like to see our second line (East/West) be Bombardier INNOVIA Monorail 300, running from Boardwalk out to the airport, along Victoria. There would also be PRT circulators (ULTra) operating at Boardwalk, Sportsworld, and R&T Park.
Reply
Interesting article:

MINNPOST - The psycology of light rail safety
Reply


(01-22-2016, 09:11 AM)Canard Wrote: I would like to see our second line (East/West) be Bombardier INNOVIA Monorail 300, running from Boardwalk out to the airport, along Victoria. There would also be PRT circulators (ULTra) operating at Boardwalk, Sportsworld, and R&T Park.

Or we could just the same trains and stuff we already have... might be able to use the existing car barns and the same people for maintenance. The eastern half of Victoria has lots of room to run LRT tracks and the western part of Victoria where it's two lanes doesn't seem to have room for LRT or a monorail track without some serious modification of the entire street taking place. I think it will be a long while before this corridor has enough transit use to justify any kind of trains.
Reply
(01-22-2016, 10:35 AM)clasher Wrote: [quote pid='16088' dateline='1453468302']
Or we could just the same trains and stuff we already have... might be able to use the existing car barns and the same people for maintenance. The eastern half of Victoria has lots of room to run LRT tracks and the western part of Victoria where it's two lanes doesn't seem to have room for LRT or a monorail track without some serious modification of the entire street taking place. I think it will be a long while before this corridor has enough transit use to justify any kind of trains.

[/quote]

It was reported in the Record last month that, after only a couple of months of service, there were about 2,140 riders a day on the new 204 Victoria service. A tenth of expected ridership on Ion. You're right then that it will likely be a while, and I can't really envision development that will promote transit growth in the near term.

Connecting the airport to downtown might be desirable one day. That would add 50% more distance over a Victoria line running between the Boardwalk and the river (near where there is no logical, though).

Part of me thinks that Victoria is the logical next line, and that ridership from the suburbs would be attracted to higher-order transit. But ridership is much more proven elsewhere, and it's hard to see how the other municipalities could be convinced to support a Kitchener-only line when it's so easy to point to the utilization of the 201 and 202.

Edit: on the other hand, the investment in the station might make a Victoria line more logical. Where would a line on University meet the King line?
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links