Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
10-16-2016, 08:50 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-16-2016, 09:27 AM by Canard.)
Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
10-16-2016, 08:55 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-16-2016, 08:56 AM by Canard.)
Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
10-16-2016, 09:00 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-16-2016, 09:00 AM by Canard.)
Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
11/11 - Saturday, October 15, 2016
I saved the best for last: the crossover at Conestoga! I just love all the fixture work for securing this very complex piece of special trackwork.
Posts: 8,029
Threads: 39
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
217
(10-16-2016, 09:00 AM)Canard Wrote: I hate to sound negative, but I'm not really happy with how these pedestrian crossings turned out for trail crossings on the Waterloo Spur. I hate to use the term, but they feel hostile. I'm not sure what could be done to improve the look or feel of them.
Showing the new 6-lamp crossing lights - the two lamps facing the tracks are white, and indicate to train operators that the signal is in fact activated (they flash at the same time as the two red ones facing those wishing to cross).
Hostile is exactly the word to use. You are not the only one to feel this way.
Posts: 2,015
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
77
Are these signals and lights and barriers only necessary because the line carries heavy freight rail or is it some other law? i.e. if it were a dedicated LRT right of way with no other train traffic would the same precautions be taken?
Everyone move to the back of the bus and we all get home faster.
Posts: 8,029
Threads: 39
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
217
(10-16-2016, 10:53 AM)Pheidippides Wrote: Are these signals and lights and barriers only necessary because the line carries heavy freight rail or is it some other law? i.e. if it were a dedicated LRT right of way with no other train traffic would the same precautions be taken?
This was my thought, but as was pointed out to me, similar barriers and fences are in place along the Hydro Corridor which carries no freight.
Posts: 213
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
6
Canard, some of those pics look like the rails turn down William St E!
Posts: 1,321
Threads: 2
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
42
There is a 65km/h speed along that stretch and electric trains are kinda quiet so that's probably part of the reason that they have those gates. Is there an off-the-shelf solution besides these kinds of gates?
Posts: 1,095
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
33
Lost-esque sonic barriers?
Posts: 4,604
Threads: 16
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
150
(10-16-2016, 08:43 AM)Canard Wrote: Two separate issues. The media is correct that the new platform rework that started in the past few weeks was for the distance to the rail CL. They don't know about the grounding issue.
So here's what I don't get. if this new issue has nothing to do with the grounding of the rebar, why are they removing concrete so far back? Can't they just bring in a cutter and shave off those few errant millimetres?
Posts: 1,103
Threads: 3
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
60
I think most of the hostility comes form the fencing. If they were
A) not grey chianlink fences, or at least covered by some shrubs / trees, and
B) didn't have the 2 perpendicular pieces and the opening that look like they are "funnelling" people though,
it would look a lot nicer.
Posts: 8,029
Threads: 39
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
217
10-16-2016, 02:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-16-2016, 02:37 PM by danbrotherston.)
(10-16-2016, 01:37 PM)clasher Wrote: There is a 65km/h speed along that stretch and electric trains are kinda quiet so that's probably part of the reason that they have those gates. Is there an off-the-shelf solution besides these kinds of gates?
On the other edge of the park there is a similar ROW that carries traffic often moving at 65 km/h and sometimes no noisier than the LRT. It's called a road.
It has everything to do with the general railway regulations and nothing to do with the specific conditions and needs of this particular installation.
|