Posts: 1,567
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
140
The fact the article says they're entering negotiations with the region rather bidding through a proposal process I think confirms they were the only people to answer the RFQ (or at least the only technically compliant one).
It's a common process in large deals like this that if there's ever only one technically compliant bidder then the pricing envelopes are returned unopened (or in this case, never created) and the government enters direct negotiations.
Posts: 6,693
Threads: 38
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
118
I believe in this case they were the only bidder, period. Or am I mistaken about that?
Posts: 116
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation:
4
They were the only respondent. I believe it was a request for qualifications and there weren't any cost submissions. So if they met the requirements of the RFQ then presumably the Region would negotiate directly with them.
Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
When will a design be presented?
Posts: 6,693
Threads: 38
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
118
How will the process work? Is it the Region or the developer that comes up with the concept? Will the Region need to issue a contract for the design?
Posts: 1,709
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
35
A more pertinent question was what option were the potential bidders presented with? Low, Mid, or High density?
Posts: 1,321
Threads: 2
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
42
An RFQ is about proving the company can build something, ie prove their track record and experience. I would guess that since EllisDon is involved that they can show a track record for developing large projects but the RFP will likely show all 3 options if that is what the region wants for proposals. AFAIK they haven't picked one yet.
Posts: 625
Threads: 4
Joined: Jul 2016
Reputation:
22
can we change the name of this thread to Multimodal Transit Hub or King & Victoria Transit Hub as that is the name the Region uses?
Posts: 1,567
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
140
I'm sure Perimeter is working on it, and based on their previous work (Google KW, 305 King, 345 King, Simpson building, etc) I trust that it will be good. I think the contract specifies timelines for transit components that include completion around 2021, so they'll probably have to break ground in 2018 (maybe early 2019) to hit that. So that's a year, but not years.
The big question is how much office or residential they think the market can take, and they'll have to answer that for themselves before we see any renders. Perimeter seems to be the most successful company at downtown office leasing right now, so that's a good start. The market seems to be better for residential right now though (look how fast Momentum can sell), but it's not clear how much of the site could be residential given requirements for minimum separation from rail corridors. Perimeter also doesn't have any residential experience AFAIK.
Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
That’s the first I’ve heard of concrete (ha!) dates, thanks!
If they’re going to break ground in 2018, surely we are just months away from seeing the final design?