Posts: 2,015
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
77
My money is on Ottawa starting first; I don't think it will even be close.
They seem much further along in testing and vehicle assembly.
This Ottawa council has a list of official recent updates (mostly PDFed photos).
Everyone move to the back of the bus and we all get home faster.
Posts: 2,877
Threads: 3
Joined: Mar 2015
Reputation:
98
(08-28-2018, 06:09 PM)Pheidippides Wrote: My money is on Ottawa starting first; I don't think it will even be close.
They seem much further along in testing and vehicle assembly.
This Ottawa council has a list of official recent updates (mostly PDFed photos).
They sure have a lot of the system underground. Really sucks that we couldn't have done that here, but I guess money is more available in Ottawa.
Posts: 7,713
Threads: 36
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
210
(08-29-2018, 01:23 PM)jeffster Wrote: (08-28-2018, 06:09 PM)Pheidippides Wrote: My money is on Ottawa starting first; I don't think it will even be close.
They seem much further along in testing and vehicle assembly.
This Ottawa council has a list of official recent updates (mostly PDFed photos).
They sure have a lot of the system underground. Really sucks that we couldn't have done that here, but I guess money is more available in Ottawa.
What is the value in putting the system underground?
It's a lot money, so we should try to be clear about what benefits we hope to achieve by burying it.
Posts: 1,195
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2015
Reputation:
34
I don't see any value that could be gained by burying our system. If grade separation was important, I would rather elevate than bury.
Posts: 4,462
Threads: 15
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
131
Ottawa had the advantage of much better geology. They have very solid bedrock, very close under the surface, that can mostly hold itself up.
We have sand, and high water tables. Not very helpful at all.
Posts: 2,004
Threads: 7
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
125
Burying under downtown is also arguably one of the sole reasons they embarked on the LRT conversion. The system worked reasonably well out in the suburbs. It was an nightmare downtown, even when I lived there 20 years ago. Ottawa didn't really have a choice but to bury it.
Posts: 1,709
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
35
(08-29-2018, 02:53 PM)jamincan Wrote: Burying under downtown is also arguably one of the sole reasons they embarked on the LRT conversion. The system worked reasonably well out in the suburbs. It was an nightmare downtown, even when I lived there 20 years ago. Ottawa didn't really have a choice but to bury it.
A big part of that is that the city designed seemingly every route to go along that buried stretch. They were very big fans of the transfer-less system, where you could hop on a bus at the end of your obscure cul-de-sac in Kanata or Orleans, and get delivered 20+ kilometers to Tunney's Pasture, where countless government employees work. A single-transfer system might have bought them a lot more time.
Posts: 7,713
Threads: 36
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation:
210
08-29-2018, 03:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-29-2018, 03:33 PM by danbrotherston.)
(08-29-2018, 02:53 PM)jamincan Wrote: Burying under downtown is also arguably one of the sole reasons they embarked on the LRT conversion. The system worked reasonably well out in the suburbs. It was an nightmare downtown, even when I lived there 20 years ago. Ottawa didn't really have a choice but to bury it.
They did have an option of not burying it. It's always a question of tradeoffs. What was the benefit of burying it? The alternative is taking a lane of traffic and giving priority at all the intersections. Value in burying it is to give more space for cars. The same is true here, and given how little traffic congestion we have, I believe burying (or elevating) the LRT would have been a big waste of money.
But no matter* where it is always remember that the main beneficiary of burying transit is generally automobile traffic.**
* Up to a certain density only seen in places like Manhattan or maybe downtown Toronto, but not Ottawa, and with other obvious geological exceptions like rivers and mountains. And of course it is also technically possible to replace the space with something else (a greenspace, bike lanes, buildings) but AFAIK this is not the typical case.
** This is not an attack on cars, or a value judgement. But it is important to understand what exactly we get for our money.
Posts: 1,761
Threads: 3
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
146
08-29-2018, 03:47 PM
I had my first LRT spotting today while at DTK for a meeting. and low and behold, the train had to stop and wait while it blew its horn...
Posts: 4,396
Threads: 1
Joined: May 2015
Reputation:
188
(08-29-2018, 01:23 PM)jeffster Wrote: They sure have a lot of the system underground. Really sucks that we couldn't have done that here, but I guess money is more available in Ottawa.
Last time I looked at plans it seemed the only part underground is the bit through Downtown. There are some trenched areas but those were already trenched for the Transitway. By “a lot” do you just mean “more than ours”?
As to our system, I’m not sure where you would bury it. Uptown is one candidate but the creek probably makes that impractical (not impossible; just really expensive, even by the standards of a buried system).
Posts: 1,709
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
35
(08-29-2018, 03:27 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: (08-29-2018, 02:53 PM)jamincan Wrote: Burying under downtown is also arguably one of the sole reasons they embarked on the LRT conversion. The system worked reasonably well out in the suburbs. It was an nightmare downtown, even when I lived there 20 years ago. Ottawa didn't really have a choice but to bury it.
They did have an option of not burying it. It's always a question of tradeoffs. What was the benefit of burying it? The alternative is taking a lane of traffic and giving priority at all the intersections. Value in burying it is to give more space for cars. The same is true here, and given how little traffic congestion we have, I believe burying (or elevating) the LRT would have been a big waste of money.
But no matter* where it is always remember that the main beneficiary of burying transit is generally automobile traffic.**
* Up to a certain density only seen in places like Manhattan or maybe downtown Toronto, but not Ottawa, and with other obvious geological exceptions like rivers and mountains. And of course it is also technically possible to replace the space with something else (a greenspace, bike lanes, buildings) but AFAIK this is not the typical case.
** This is not an attack on cars, or a value judgement. But it is important to understand what exactly we get for our money.
Ottawa did have bus lanes in that section, so it would have been a change from bus lanes that had to deal with traffic lights to light rail lines that had to deal with traffic lights. I expect a lot of bus routes will still use those corridors, whereas they would need to turn those into transit-only routes to keep LRT and buses there (so that each had a way to offload passengers while not interfering with the other public transit vehicle type).
Posts: 6,562
Threads: 38
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
96
(08-29-2018, 05:06 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: (08-29-2018, 01:23 PM)jeffster Wrote: They sure have a lot of the system underground. Really sucks that we couldn't have done that here, but I guess money is more available in Ottawa.
Last time I looked at plans it seemed the only part underground is the bit through Downtown. There are some trenched areas but those were already trenched for the Transitway. By “a lot” do you just mean “more than ours”?
As to our system, I’m not sure where you would bury it. Uptown is one candidate but the creek probably makes that impractical (not impossible; just really expensive, even by the standards of a buried system).
Correct - 2.5km and three stations on the 12.5km line.
Posts: 667
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2017
Reputation:
26
08-30-2018, 11:39 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-30-2018, 11:39 AM by trainspotter139.)
Federal Minister of Environment and Climate Change Catherine McKenna got a tour of 507 today at Kitchener City Hall Station. https://twitter.com/PickelPress/status/1...7054066688 https://twitter.com/cathmckenna/status/1...9728731137
Posts: 4,462
Threads: 15
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
131
First time I've seen a 'step aboard' photo op at a station, rather than the OMSF.
Posts: 6,905
Threads: 32
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
224
Yeah, and even in the driver's seat, no less! I don't think even Tom has had that privilege yet!
|