Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The COVID-19 pandemic
Surely most of this will be addressed when the program is announced.
Reply


(08-31-2021, 11:11 PM)panamaniac Wrote: Surely most of this will be addressed when the program is announced.
It wasn't really in BC but one can hope. Personally I dont have that much faith in our provincial government
Reply
There are some good points here, I'd just like to make a few counterpoints.

(08-31-2021, 11:05 PM)Bjays93 Wrote: Ok my comment generated a lot of discussion so warning for a long comment incoming, I'm going to address several things that were brought up from my perspective. 

First and foremost, I really appreciate that this whole discussion has been civil because that's rare these days, I've brought up my opposition to vaccine passports at other places and basically been ridiculed for it. 

I'd like to clarify that my opposition to vaccine passports is not simply just that I'm against it, but more so the lack of any sort of clarity or explanation around them worries me. 

There has been absolutely no discussion or dialogue around what these vaccine passports will look like or how long they'll last until after they're in effect. 

I am not against mandatory vaccination and/or rapid test (I understand neither of these methods are flawless but they are substantially better than nothing). I'm not a fan of forcing mandatory vaccinations without allowing negative tests it just seems unnecessary and contradictory if the ultimate goal is simply just public health. 

It isn't actually supportive of the same public health goals. One major goal of mandatory vaccination (and vaccine passports) is to get people vaccinated. Permitting rapid testing in preference to that does not achieve that goal. It may achieve the goal of limiting spread, but it doesn't end the pandemic faster.

(08-31-2021, 11:05 PM)Bjays93 Wrote: Secondly, I'm not against temporary vaccine measures, like say a lockdown of unvaccinated until the case numbers drop again. That's totally fair imo and those who are fully vaxed should not have to endure another lockdown if it were to come to that, otherwise what even was the point of getting vaccinated (at least in terms of regaining your freedoms) 

Again, vaccination is not a personal choice, these are social communal acts. The point of getting vaccinated was so that we all can regain our freedoms.

(08-31-2021, 11:05 PM)Bjays93 Wrote: Currently there is no guarantee about the length, or purpose of vaccine passport systems. I would be against such as system remaining in place if we were down to only a handful of cases a day at some point for example. 

I agree there should be a clearer statement of context. But first and foremost, that context include some measure of vaccination rate which is a goal (and the end game for the pandemic), and it should probably not be specific, because we don't actually know right now. And second of all, our world is changing all the time, the pandemic is a major and sudden change. But vaccination requirements are not new, and I don't think I'd oppose making them more widespread. Whether I'd support a permanent proof of vaccination for entering businesses, I don't know, probably not, but in the future, who knows. Would I support it for things like healthcare, hell yeah I would.

(08-31-2021, 11:05 PM)Bjays93 Wrote: It's also not been outlined what specifically the passports will apply to. Travel to foreign countries and require immunization. That's totally fine thats a sovereignty issue. Concerts and sporting events, or movies where you are sitting and standing still in close quarters for long periods of time. I'm fine with vaccine requirements for that too. Preventing someone from entering a mall fully masked because they're unvaxed. I'm not all too keen on that. Or prohibiting outdoor dining for unvaxed as well for example.

I'm also not ok with BCs no exception system and forcing businesses to use the system or risk being shut down. While unfortunate imagine if even 30% of your business is made up of unvaccinated individuals and you either have to throw out that 30% or get shut down after everything that's you've been through in the past two years. I dont think that's fair either and significant overreach. 

My sympathy for people in this situation is exactly zero at this point, so I'll personally disagree, but obviously it's an opinion.

Edit: I should clarify, my sympathy for the unvaccinated anti-maskers. A business which has mostly unvaxxinated anti-vaxxer customers is doing something to achieve that...maybe...I dunno...making BBQ.

But another point occurs to me, businesses actually benefit. I wouldn't eat inside a restaurant or go to a theater, but I might if I knew everyone was vaxxinated. This policy is actually beneficial to businesses.

(08-31-2021, 11:05 PM)Bjays93 Wrote: Additionally there are some obvious differences between something like a health card or driver's license and a vaccine passport. The primary difference being a driver's license does not force you to physically put anything into your body. I don't like the my body my choice argument for vaccines it's  stupid, but one should acknowledge theres a key difference between only being allowed to drive after taking a test vs only being able to go into a store if you've gotten a shot. 

I don't know how bodily autonomy ultimately applies to something like this because I understand both sides, in that people should have the right to choose if they want to get a shot of something injected, but also that someone's rights end where someone else's begin and unvaccinated pose a risk to society. But then there's the question of do unvaccinated pose much of a risk to anyone but themselves, and you have ethical dilemmas if the hospital is full of unvaccinated patients such that vaccinated ones aren't able to access certain healthcare. Its messy and I think it's hard to easily go one way or another on it. 

While I agree that bodily autonomy and driving are different (one being a privilege for example) I would argue that given our society's failure to invest in ANY form of mobility besides driving, being unable to drive for many people (not everyone) amounts to an infringement on the right of free movement. While that is not the same right as bodily autonomy, I personally believe they are equally important. Ergo to me, a drivers license (again, for many people, but not everyone, and especially not most people in this forum) is equivalent.

(And yes, I still support removing licenses from people who are dangerous drivers because the rights of the community--for safety in this case--outweigh the rights of the individual)

(08-31-2021, 11:05 PM)Bjays93 Wrote: I also understand how peoples experiences shape their opinions and having grown up in Hong Kong/Communist China and having seen the takeover and how they did all these little things to slowly chip away at peoples freedom and basically hope people would brush it aside because it was trivial (basically a slow boil) naturally seeing similar types of restrictions pop up here spooks me even if it really shouldn't. 

At the end of the day I don't know what the RIGHT thing to do is, but I do know that blanket vaccine passports with no explanation or transparency dont sit well with me. More than anything I think it's the precedent it sets less than the rationale behind it. 

I agree that we can't have a blanket vaccine passport with no explanation, that wouldn't even make sense right, because how could you do that, obviously it must be explained fully at time of implementation. But I have zero fear that our current government will err on the side of too lenient rather than too oppressive. Our government has been completely unwilling to do even the least intrusive things in order to avoid a worse outcome later. It's a shame, but it does mean I have no real worry about it going too far.

(08-31-2021, 11:05 PM)Bjays93 Wrote: There are of course other things too, like ultimately what is the goal. Is it to prevent anyone from ever getting covid and dying from it, or is it to keep our healthcare system stable. I think it should be the latter and as such restrictions should be made according in my opinion. 

Like I said very long comment. I don't even know if I touched on everything i wanted to but I'll stop now lol. Hope i cleared up my position a little bit.

Obviously keeping our healthcare system stable is a minimum requirement, and one that we haven't really met (I know people who have been impacted by the unavailability of healthcare resources during the pandemic). That being said, I think we should aim higher. The flu is a good example, because everyone says "ahh, COVID just the flu" is of course isn't, but in hindsight, the fact that we were tolerating so many deaths from the flu, in a time and place where we have a (less, but still effective) vaccine against it...that's insane! Literally hundreds of children died of the flu in 2019. Why do we accept that? We have the same problem with road violence, but that's a horse we've beaten here plenty of times.

I'm not suggesting that we should lockdown because of the flu, but given that we have tools that can limit or even eliminate fatalities, why aren't we using them to the maximum extent. I was shocked to learn that the flu vaccine is not even free in BC.
Reply
Officially, vaccine passports will be required at most non-essential businesses starting September 22: https://www.cp24.com/news/proof-of-vacci...-1.5569180
Reply
(09-01-2021, 09:56 AM)ac3r Wrote: Officially, vaccine passports will be required at most non-essential businesses starting September 22: https://www.cp24.com/news/proof-of-vacci...-1.5569180

Absolute incompetence as always

Quote:Starting Sept. 22, proof of vaccination will be required at many non-essential businesses in Ontario, 

[...]

The provincial government is working on an app [...] to embed this data into a personalized QR code, which will be ready in October.

That's going to be absolute chaos of asking people to use easily forged and easily lost paper receipts at first. And then asking businesses to make the transition to an app. The app should have been worked on months ago.
Reply
(09-01-2021, 10:05 AM)taylortbb Wrote:
(09-01-2021, 09:56 AM)ac3r Wrote: Officially, vaccine passports will be required at most non-essential businesses starting September 22: https://www.cp24.com/news/proof-of-vacci...-1.5569180

Absolute incompetence as always

Quote:Starting Sept. 22, proof of vaccination will be required at many non-essential businesses in Ontario, 

[...]

The provincial government is working on an app [...] to embed this data into a personalized QR code, which will be ready in October.

That's going to be absolute chaos of asking people to use easily forged and easily lost paper receipts at first. And then asking businesses to make the transition to an app. The app should have been worked on months ago.
They should just license Quebec's app.
Reply
Man...I have low expectations from our government, but even so...I'm still laughing.
Reply


(09-01-2021, 10:38 AM)neonjoe Wrote:
(09-01-2021, 10:05 AM)taylortbb Wrote: Absolute incompetence as always


That's going to be absolute chaos of asking people to use easily forged and easily lost paper receipts at first. And then asking businesses to make the transition to an app. The app should have been worked on months ago.

They should just license Quebec's app.

Or one of the many other apps that have already been developed in other countries.
Reply
Current 7-day Covid-19 cases per 100k

• Windsor-Essex County Health Unit 113.2
• City of Hamilton Public Health Services 84.3
• Chatham-Kent Public Health 48.0
• York Region Public Health 45.6
• Brant County Health Unit 40.6

• Peel Public Health 37.2
• Durham Region Health Department 35.9
• Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Public Health 34.3
• Middlesex-London Health Unit 34.3
• Toronto Public Health 33.2

• Region of Waterloo Public Health and Emergency Services 27.0


• Algoma Public Health 9.6
• Lambton Public Health 8.4
• North Bay Parry Sound District Health Unit 7.7
• Thunder Bay District Health Unit 7.3
• Leeds, Grenville & Lanark District Health Unit 5.2
• Haliburton, Kawartha, Pine Ridge District Health Unit 3.7
• Kingston, Frontenac and Lennox & Addington Public Health 2.8
• Northwestern Health Unit 2.3
• Renfrew County and District Health Unit 0.9

• Timiskaming Health Unit 0.0

• TOTAL ONTARIO 33.0
Reply
(09-01-2021, 10:38 AM)neonjoe Wrote:
(09-01-2021, 10:05 AM)taylortbb Wrote: Absolute incompetence as always


That's going to be absolute chaos of asking people to use easily forged and easily lost paper receipts at first. And then asking businesses to make the transition to an app. The app should have been worked on months ago.
They should just license Quebec's app.

No….

https://mobilesyrup.com/2021/08/27/quebe...er-launch/
Reply
(09-01-2021, 12:24 PM)jeffster Wrote:
(09-01-2021, 10:38 AM)neonjoe Wrote: They should just license Quebec's app.

No….

https://mobilesyrup.com/2021/08/27/quebe...er-launch/

I think the Digital COVID Certificate would be a better option.
https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-trav...ificate_en
Reply
(09-01-2021, 11:20 AM)tomh009 Wrote:
(09-01-2021, 10:38 AM)neonjoe Wrote: They should just license Quebec's app.

Or one of the many other apps that have already been developed in other countries.

A company in Toronto is already developing their own independent app, since the government didn't want to initially do anything like this: https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/no-government...-1.5561316
Reply
(09-01-2021, 12:24 PM)jeffster Wrote:
(09-01-2021, 10:38 AM)neonjoe Wrote: They should just license Quebec's app.

No….

https://mobilesyrup.com/2021/08/27/quebe...er-launch/

Eh...anything can and will be backed. The Province of Ontario can developer their own but that too could and probably will be hacked. It is a good thing if hackers can demonstrate flaws in a system so long as it's white hats doing it as a form of security audit.
Reply


WEDNESDAY 2021-09-01

Waterloo Region reported 30 new cases for today (18.9% of the active cases) and zero additional for yesterday for 20; 162 new cases for the week (+14 from yesterday and +35 from last week), averaging 14.4% of active cases. 169 active cases, +21 in the last seven days.

Next testing report on Friday.

1,409 doses of vaccine administered, with a seven-day average at 1,322 (previous week was 1,542). 73.85% of total regional population vaccinated (+0.09% from yesterday, +0.53% over the past week), 68.05% fully vaccinated (+0.15% from yesterday, +1.06% over the past week).

Ontario reported 656 new cases today with a seven-day average of 701 (-1), compared to 625 a week ago. 650 recoveries and seven (new) deaths translated to a decrease of seven active cases and a new total of 5,861. +721 active cases and seven deaths for the week. 27,572 tests with a positivity rate of 2.38%. The positivity rate is averaging 2.86% for the past seven days, compared to 2.65% for the preceding seven.

135 people in the ICU, +4 from yesterday and +10 over the past week. Total hospital population of 339, +56 for the week.

34,703 doses of vaccine administered yesterday, with a seven-day average at 32,312 (previous week was 38,708). 73.56% of total provincial population vaccinated (+0.09% from yesterday, +0.55% from 7 days ago), 67.69% fully vaccinated (+0.14% from yesterday, +0.98% from 7 days ago).

Cases/100K by region:
  • 50 cases in Windsor-Essex: 12.9 per 100K
  • 73 cases in Hamilton: 12.6 per 100K
  • 12 cases in Chatham-Kent: 11.3 per 100K
  • 30 cases in Middlesex-London: 7.4 per 100K
  • 20 cases in Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph: 7.4 per 100K
  • 76 cases in York: 6.8 per 100K
  • 158 cases in Toronto: 5.4 per 100K
  • 29 cases in Halton: 5.3 per 100K
  • 31 cases in Durham: 4.8 per 100K
  • 6 cases in Brant: 4.4 per 100K
  • 59 cases in Peel: 4.3 per 100K
  • 26 cases in Waterloo: 4.2 per 100K (based on provincial reporting)
  • 22 cases in Simcoe-Muskoka: 4.1 per 100K
  • 14 cases in Niagara: 3.1 per 100K
  • 22 cases in Ottawa: 2.2 per 100K
  • 4 cases in Eastern Ontario: 2.0 per 100K
  • 3 cases in Grey Bruce: 1.9 per 100K
  • 3 cases in Southwestern Ontario: 1.5 per 100K
  • 2 cases in Thunder Bay: 1.3 per 100K
  • 1 cases in Huron Perth: 1.0 per 100K
Reply
(08-23-2021, 01:43 PM)tomh009 Wrote: Our (Canadian) vaccination rate is good by global standards at 73.16% (first dose), but that still leaves about 14% of the population eligible but not vaccinated.

Portugal, on the other hand, has bumped their first-dose percentage from 68.95% to 80.57% (!) in just the last three weeks. Why? How? It appears that the key is the vaccination requirement: inside dining and bars require two vaccinations after 7 PM on Fridays and on weekends/holidays (or a recent PCR test), for example, giving plenty of incentive to get vaccinated.

The Portuguese infection rate is still fairly high but now appears to have stabilized, whereas we are still clearly on the upslope.

So, do we have enough incentives coming up? The Ontario government has only mandated vaccination for hospitals, but the federal government has taken some action -- and private companies are continuing to announce requirements. At times ongoing testing will be accepted (who will pay may vary) but even so the incentive to get vaccinated will be significant.

Will this be enough to get us to 80% of the total population?

So, Ford and Elliott caved, and we're getting vaccine "passports" after all, even if they are not exactly prepared for it quite yet. This list looks much better now:
  • Federal government
  • Hospitals (employees) and ambulance services
  • Air Canada, including passengers
  • Porter Airlines, including passengers
  • WestJet, including passengers
  • Sun Life
  • "Big Five" chartered banks
  • Most universities and colleges
  • Amazon
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Microsoft
  • Twitter
  • Live Nation
  • Winnipeg Jets
  • Toronto Argonauts
  • Toronto Blue Jays
  • Toronto FC
  • Toronto Maple Leafs
  • Toronto Raptors
  • Ontario Hockey League
  • All indoor dining
  • All indoor fitness facilities
  • All night clubs, including outdoor areas
  • All indoor meeting and conference facilities
  • All movie and other theatres
  • All casinos and other gaming
  • All sporting events
  • All concerts and music festivals
Notably missing non-essential retail (though some will surely implement the same policy) and religious facilities
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links