(06-11-2017, 08:29 PM)Rainrider22 Wrote:(06-11-2017, 06:16 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: Someone can tell Canard those aren't bike lanes. They are only "edge lines" to optically narrow the excessively wide lanes. They have no legal protections like bike lanes and also won't be continuous (not that bike lanes usually are anyway).
Courtland has this.
Better than nothing. Wow talk about a Debbie downer.
two things here:
1) "Better than nothing" isn't really true...sometimes nothing is better, especially when there is an illusion of something. But there are plenty of others here who can elaborate the "why" of this better than I could.
2) Not sure what the "Debbie Downer" is about. If it's about the first sentence, reportedly there is some "bug" whereby Canard can't see Dan's messages unless they are quoted. If its about the discontinuity of bike lanes, than that is a true statement, and I'm not sure when Dan is a "Debbie Downer" for noting it...