01-07-2022, 12:53 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-07-2022, 12:54 PM by danbrotherston.)
(01-07-2022, 11:14 AM)panamaniac Wrote:(01-07-2022, 11:11 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: I really don’t understand the obsession some planners have with sports facilities. They usually turn out badly. This is an overwhelmingly bad idea. It’s frustrating how few are it.
How so? The idea of a new arena, the location, the suggested mechanism to pay for it, or a preference for other spending priorities?
There are many reasons.
For one, the priorities are wrong. We shouldn’t be spending money on a new arena, and the planner is utterly naive to believe we can get it for free. Sporting venues very often end up being a complete quagmire.
For two, there are so many much more valuable things we can do in that space. Many want an indigenous centre, but even if you’re not on board with that it’s at the centre of our city, a high density and intensity of use is vastly better than something that gets used a handful of days a week at best.
For three, the location is poor. I hate that we live in a car dependent city, but we do, and especially a venue like an arena will demand a huge amount of parking, and because of the lack of vision of most people in our society, they won’t even consider the Benton garage, so it will result in a huge amount of parking added downtown. Worse, it’s actually a dense residential area meaning nights it is used there will be significant disruption to many more peoples lives.
Do you want a fourth reason? I think it’s a waste to build a new arena, the Aud is fine, the current location is good, it could easily be renovated. The same people demanding a new arena will throw a tantrum if you plan to demolish anything more than 60 years old.
Also a typo in my first: *frustrating how few *see* it