Charles St GRT terminal redevelopment

[danbrotherston]

Am I the only one who thinks there's nothing wrong with the Aud as it is today? They have repeatedly updated and improved it over the past 20 years and probably back even further. I see no reason why it can't continue to be upgraded, expanded and improved for another 30+ years. I hate the mentality in the sports world that a venue is old and must be replaced just because it's 40 years old. It's EXTREMELY wasteful to replace a building let alone a large one like the Aud.

Yeah, this is on point!

I don't get it, like I said, the same people who are advocating for this, would also argue against tearing down even a single home over 60 years old.

It isn't about heritage or smart use of resources.