05-05-2023, 12:38 PM
(05-05-2023, 12:13 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: I thought it was only a 66% majority for material changes to the common elements (which depending on how the condo is structure, is what parking could be defined as.
But I think the point remains...it would be extremely difficult and extremely risky.
If you look on the Kitchener GIS system, the west building (410 King) has dozens of parking spots individually drawn. The borders of the condo corp don't even go around the parking lot. So I suspect the parking spots aren't even common elements, but individually titled to the unit owners. It's probably even harder than suggested, and short of dissolving the condo corp a single parking spot owner could likely block the deal.
The east building (404 King) appears to have a more normal structure, with the parking lot appearing as one property with the building. It would probably be far more feasible for that to be combined with the adjacent building, creating a new development along Duke St. That won't help with getting something developed along Victoria St opposite the transit hub though.