05-05-2023, 05:36 PM
(05-05-2023, 12:13 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: It's been a long time since I've done the condo training, but I thought it was only a 66% majority for material changes to the common elements (which depending on how the condo is structure, is what parking could be defined as.
But I think the point remains...it would be extremely difficult and extremely risky.
Sorry, yes, there is a 2/3 requirement for major changes to the common elements. I should have mentioned that too — the numbers I mention are for changes to the documents which legally define the condominium whereas the 2/3 is for changes to the realworld form of the condominium. Until approximately 20 years ago I believe changes to the declaration were required to be unanimous but that was changed to the 80% or 90%, presumably to avoid problems of holdouts (or even just owners simply being unreachable).
Your point definitely remains, no question. I just can’t miss an opportunity to be pedantic…