10-31-2017, 08:57 AM
Someone is always going to be upset, but they should not be heeded…ever? Sometimes the arguments are legitimate. I wouldn’t say that all of them are in this case, or even most, but I do see merit in the argument that additional height should not be awarded along with a reduced setback from residential properties on an adjacent street. Those setbacks are required for a reason.
“Density” isn’t binary. Regardless of the rejection of one or more of the seven variances requested, the site will receive additional density. It won’t be mixed-use, unfortunately.
“Density” isn’t binary. Regardless of the rejection of one or more of the seven variances requested, the site will receive additional density. It won’t be mixed-use, unfortunately.