07-17-2019, 08:01 AM
There's an article about the motor vehicles driving on the Fairway walking and cycling trail.
https://www.therecord.com/news-story/950...-corridor/
This article bugs me for three reasons:
1. They don't explicitly say there are motor vehicles driving on the walking and cycling trail. People reading this unfamiliar with the area will infer the vehicles are driving around on roads. This is a gross mis-characterization of the situation. Which leads to...
2. It isn't about safety. If it was, they wouldn't be driving SUVs down a CYCLING AND WALKING TRAIL
3. Apparently the LRT crossing won't be open to pedestrians until next year, which is a bad joke...both in that they could not fail at this more completely, why would it take so long to open, that's utter BS, and secondly, in that people will be using it once it exists, it doesn't matter what temporary fences they put up or aggressive dangerous driving of motor vehicles on a walking and cycling trail they try to use to stop it.
https://www.therecord.com/news-story/950...-corridor/
This article bugs me for three reasons:
1. They don't explicitly say there are motor vehicles driving on the walking and cycling trail. People reading this unfamiliar with the area will infer the vehicles are driving around on roads. This is a gross mis-characterization of the situation. Which leads to...
2. It isn't about safety. If it was, they wouldn't be driving SUVs down a CYCLING AND WALKING TRAIL
3. Apparently the LRT crossing won't be open to pedestrians until next year, which is a bad joke...both in that they could not fail at this more completely, why would it take so long to open, that's utter BS, and secondly, in that people will be using it once it exists, it doesn't matter what temporary fences they put up or aggressive dangerous driving of motor vehicles on a walking and cycling trail they try to use to stop it.