09-14-2019, 09:24 AM
(09-14-2019, 12:52 AM)jeffster Wrote: However, it seemed to be that this discussion was about whether or not publishing important information was 'shaming' or not.
You seem to be assuming that whether or not the cyclist was wearing a helmet is “important information”.
What I think is important is whether the car was someplace/sometime it shouldn’t have been.
It is perfectly possible for the cyclist to do/not do something relevant, but whether they have a helmet on isn’t really it, certainly not with respect to the occurrence of the collision (rather than its effects).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpP7gMPzC78
To go back to my admittedly provocative rape analogy, is it an important fact whether the crime occurred next to a hedge that provides a hiding place, which the (probably female) victim hypothetically could have avoided by significantly restricting her movements at all times?