06-19-2020, 03:42 PM
(06-18-2020, 04:28 PM)jeffster Wrote:WOW, I love that statement... I will use that line. So many people are in a rush to try and erase history right now, I find it sad.. If we don't remind ourselves of our errors, we will make the same errors again in the future...(06-18-2020, 09:28 AM)panamaniac Wrote: How about "Mountbatten", since "Windsor" is already taken? Is there anyplace that already carries the name?
Seriously, if K-W can't be amalgamated into a new City of Waterloo, then I wouldn't be bothered to change the name.
As I mentioned before, Waterloo isn't a much better choice as it was named after a battle. Many of the casualties simply disappeared, likely POW's and some to concentration camps. At some point, I am sure people will start wondering why the cities name would be glorifying a war, and likely slightly offensive to the French population as well. If we truly actually did thorough research on war, all wars, including recent actions, I think many wouldn't want to be associated with the horrendous acts of violence against innocent people (victims of war - collateral damage). I by this, I mean villages and towns being raided, women and children being murdered and/or raped. Lots of nasty stuff.
While I don't have an answer, but I did see this posted somewhere:
"History is not there for you to like or dislike. It is there for you to learn from it. And if it offends you, even better. Because then you are less likely to repeat it. It's not yours to erase. It belongs to all of us!"
I think it brings up many valid points. Is there valid reasons for erasing our history? If we erase Kitchener, would we not also decide to erase Waterloo? As I said before, you start opening Pandora's box, and you may not be able to stop it. But then again, perhaps that's what people want.