08-29-2021, 11:49 PM
(08-29-2021, 10:42 PM)tomh009 Wrote:(08-29-2021, 10:12 AM)danbrotherston Wrote: I dunno...it isn't that wide, given that someone decided that the park should also be a main cycling route, 4m would have been a better choice than 2m.
Looking at it today, it sure doesn't look like a 2m width. The "last" bridge (closest to Victoria St) is either 1.8m or 2m wide, and the new bridge looks like it's half again as wide. Can't actually access it to measure it, though.
Maybe it's wider, I'm guessing based on the images. It didn't look 3m but hard to tell for sure. FWIW 4m is the "correct" width for a 3 meter trail because with vertical walls there should be a 0.5m buffer.