01-07-2022, 12:46 PM
(01-07-2022, 11:10 AM)the_conestoga_guy Wrote: However, I personally don't care as much for the potential of the Charles Terminal site as much as I do about the Aud site. I think that area has massive potential to be redeveloped (if done thoughtfully). Perhaps by refurbishing the older parts of the existing Aud as a new community center, which itself could center a large scale development with a significant affordable housing component. I honestly wasn't aware of the "sewer trunk" cited in the article (which is funny, since I work to design water/wastewater infrastructure - I should know better!), and how it also lends itself to being prepared to take on an additional load without the need for upgrades.
I think the Aud site is big enough to contain a new Aud building, structured parking and significant redevelopment. It's over 44 acres, and probably about half of it is surface parking today.