Amalgamation

[urbd]

Ok here's one more for you: no. And okay? It's an online forum - am I supposed to go back pages and pages so that I am allowed to contribute? People are allowed to jump in and express an opinion at any point. So yeah, it will be Waterloo. And I will read this free forum in any way I want thanks

I shared an opinion ("sand hills is a cool name") and you shot it down ("no no no no no"). Then you said that people are allowed to express an opinion at any point.

So now I'm confused. Is it only you that gets to share their opinion at any point, or are you in fact full of shit?

I didn't shoot down your opinion, I mean I do think Sand Hills is a pretty terrible name that does not reflect this community, but if you like it it's your opinion and you're entitled to it. I simply replied 'no no no no' to emphasize that I really don't think the name will be anything other than Waterloo - I just quoted your message because it was the last one to suggest a name, I could've quoted any of the others to express the same thought. Maybe Kitchener-Waterloo, but it will definitely include Waterloo in its name (IN MY OPINON), because I am aware of the big push that governments, companies and institutions are doing with the Waterloo name and brand outside of our local bubble. They will not throw everything out the window and the reputation Waterloo has nationally and internationally by renaming the amalgamated city something confusing and too different. Keep sharing your opinions and be happy, no need to get mad in an internet forum.