Posts: 10,829
Threads: 67
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
392
(06-06-2020, 07:32 PM)tomh009 Wrote: (06-06-2020, 02:59 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: Nope, painting and signage would be really cheap. But I'm not holding my breath, it took years of arguing to get signs on Weber, and I'm not bothering anymore. They won't even put a 25 cent garbage bag on the idiotic pedestrians signal, if they won't do that, I don't expect them to do anything.
I'd like to give this a shot, post-COVID. My efforts may be for naught, too, but sometimes a different person asking for the same thing can make a difference.
The city staff say that they will get signs installed by the end of June. I don't have any details on this signs, so I don't know how effective they will be, but anything will be better than what we have now, and will help mitigate the risk of further similar accidents (caused by bicycle tires being caught in the LRT tracks).
Posts: 14
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2019
Reputation:
1
Took a couple of pics as I passed the UW Station bus terminal. Looks like the concrete is down where the busses will stop and some of the roadway was recently paved. Not a lot of visible progress on the pedestrian areas.
Looking east.
Looking south
Posts: 56
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation:
0
Was there am accident that caused a backup up or were they testing 8min headways yesterday. I saw one downtown go by south with another due in 8, I barely missed that one but there were two more after that both 8 min apart.
Posts: 14
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2016
Reputation:
1
(06-17-2020, 08:08 AM)ert86 Wrote: Was there am accident that caused a backup up or were they testing 8min headways yesterday. I saw one downtown go by south with another due in 8, I barely missed that one but there were two more after that both 8 min apart.
According to GRT's twitter account they were testing ATP and the previously planned 8 minute headways. Judging by the fact that you were seeing 8 minute gaps, it seems at least the headway part was going ok.
https://twitter.com/grt_row/status/12725...19360?s=21
This would be the second time ATP has been tested during revenue operations, a few weeks ago was the first. There's a reply to the above tweet from a user who has previously identified himself as an LRV operator, and according to him the last test didn't go very well. Hopefully they were more successful this time, as it has been a long wait to get ATP up and running. Four days shy of one year in operation and LRVs are still limited to 50 km/h!
Posts: 4,594
Threads: 16
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
150
Our old friend Canardian was out checking it yesterday, and tweeting videos of speedy trains. He seemed satisfied.
Posts: 4,308
Threads: 65
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation:
250
(06-17-2020, 10:02 AM)midriser Wrote: (06-17-2020, 08:08 AM)ert86 Wrote: Was there am accident that caused a backup up or were they testing 8min headways yesterday. I saw one downtown go by south with another due in 8, I barely missed that one but there were two more after that both 8 min apart.
According to GRT's twitter account they were testing ATP and the previously planned 8 minute headways. Judging by the fact that you were seeing 8 minute gaps, it seems at least the headway part was going ok.
https://twitter.com/grt_row/status/12725...19360?s=21
This would be the second time ATP has been tested during revenue operations, a few weeks ago was the first. There's a reply to the above tweet from a user who has previously identified himself as an LRV operator, and according to him the last test didn't go very well. Hopefully they were more successful this time, as it has been a long wait to get ATP up and running. Four days shy of one year in operation and LRVs are still limited to 50 km/h!
I have to say...the entire launch of light rail transit in Waterloo Region was pretty bad. Businesses lost money from construction, the trains were years late, ATP is nowhere to be seen anytime soon, people kept crashing into the vehicles because we ran it like a streetcar in the downtown/uptowns. It is not as bad as the LRT in Ottawa, where the malfunctions lead to massive logistical failures and thousands of people unable to get anywhere (granted, Ottawa has nearly 1'000'000 people), but the roll-out of everything was a bit messy.
Posts: 2,893
Threads: 3
Joined: Mar 2015
Reputation:
99
(06-18-2020, 07:27 PM)ac3r Wrote: (06-17-2020, 10:02 AM)midriser Wrote: According to GRT's twitter account they were testing ATP and the previously planned 8 minute headways. Judging by the fact that you were seeing 8 minute gaps, it seems at least the headway part was going ok.
https://twitter.com/grt_row/status/12725...19360?s=21
This would be the second time ATP has been tested during revenue operations, a few weeks ago was the first. There's a reply to the above tweet from a user who has previously identified himself as an LRV operator, and according to him the last test didn't go very well. Hopefully they were more successful this time, as it has been a long wait to get ATP up and running. Four days shy of one year in operation and LRVs are still limited to 50 km/h!
I have to say...the entire launch of light rail transit in Waterloo Region was pretty bad. Businesses lost money from construction, the trains were years late, ATP is nowhere to be seen anytime soon, people kept crashing into the vehicles because we ran it like a streetcar in the downtown/uptowns. It is not as bad as the LRT in Ottawa, where the malfunctions lead to massive logistical failures and thousands of people unable to get anywhere (granted, Ottawa has nearly 1'000'000 people), but the roll-out of everything was a bit messy.
I think some of this was expected, like contraction costing lost business and idiot drivers, but the ADP and train delays were something different. I know some were excited by the tardiness of the start-up, as a build up of anticipation, but I never saw it that way.
That said, I still think it is impressive we have an LRT in KW. Hopefully covid-19 clears up soon, so people start using it again.
Posts: 2,091
Threads: 18
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
60
(06-18-2020, 07:27 PM)ac3r Wrote: I have to say...the entire launch of light rail transit in Waterloo Region was pretty bad.
As you point out, it's relative. There are always going to be some start-up costs. Do they exceed the value provided? Could they have been less? (In some ways, yes, others, no; I'm as much in favour as anyone of eliminating systemic problems, like cars crashing into things, but can't imagine engineering the system to reduce that so much, at an acceptable point in the trade-off space).
Posts: 779
Threads: 2
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
44
They have been using ATP since Tuesday.
Posts: 4,481
Threads: 1
Joined: May 2015
Reputation:
212
(06-18-2020, 11:07 PM)plam Wrote: (06-18-2020, 07:27 PM)ac3r Wrote: I have to say...the entire launch of light rail transit in Waterloo Region was pretty bad.
As you point out, it's relative. There are always going to be some start-up costs. Do they exceed the value provided? Could they have been less? (In some ways, yes, others, no; I'm as much in favour as anyone of eliminating systemic problems, like cars crashing into things, but can't imagine engineering the system to reduce that so much, at an acceptable point in the trade-off space).
Eliminating car crashes can’t be done without imposing an airplane-style level of training, certification, investigation, and enforcement on drivers. Combined with road maintenance fees, congestion charges, carbon taxes, and probably other fees I haven’t thought of, if we fully internalized the costs of driving it would probably become so expensive that public transit could start turning a profit again.
That being said, any smaller and more politically realistic measures that we can take are welcome. Examples include narrower lanes and better design of conflict points between motor vehicles and other traffic.
I’d start with much more use of solid concrete bollards. If cars are going to crash into stuff, it should be immediately as they leave their assigned right-of-way rather than later when they crash into whatever happens to be there.
Posts: 668
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2017
Reputation:
26
(06-19-2020, 04:49 AM)Square Wrote: They have been using ATP since Tuesday.
Can confirm ATP is definitely on*.
* not all LRVs seem to be using it yet and drivers definitely need to get used to it being on. (Overspeed correction braking is a bit severe right now).
Posts: 2,091
Threads: 18
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
60
(06-19-2020, 08:22 AM)ijmorlan Wrote: (06-18-2020, 11:07 PM)plam Wrote: As you point out, it's relative. There are always going to be some start-up costs. Do they exceed the value provided? Could they have been less? (In some ways, yes, others, no; I'm as much in favour as anyone of eliminating systemic problems, like cars crashing into things, but can't imagine engineering the system to reduce that so much, at an acceptable point in the trade-off space).
Eliminating car crashes can’t be done without imposing an airplane-style level of training, certification, investigation, and enforcement on drivers. Combined with road maintenance fees, congestion charges, carbon taxes, and probably other fees I haven’t thought of, if we fully internalized the costs of driving it would probably become so expensive that public transit could start turning a profit again.
That being said, any smaller and more politically realistic measures that we can take are welcome. Examples include narrower lanes and better design of conflict points between motor vehicles and other traffic.
I’d start with much more use of solid concrete bollards. If cars are going to crash into stuff, it should be immediately as they leave their assigned right-of-way rather than later when they crash into whatever happens to be there.
Agree mostly. Two points: 1) I'm pretty sure GO Transit is cheaper than single-occupancy vehicle driving already (if you include car depreciation, not just gas); 2) I'd be in favour of bollards, but they don't help with intersections, where most collisions happen. (Not that this is a reason not to use them).
Posts: 5
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2020
Reputation:
0
06-20-2020, 03:59 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-21-2020, 12:55 AM by Wigs.)
(06-18-2020, 07:27 PM)ac3r Wrote: I have to say...the entire launch of light rail transit in Waterloo Region was pretty bad. Businesses lost money from construction, the trains were years late, ATP is nowhere to be seen anytime soon, people kept crashing into the vehicles because we ran it like a streetcar in the downtown/uptowns. It is not as bad as the LRT in Ottawa, where the malfunctions lead to massive logistical failures and thousands of people unable to get anywhere (granted, Ottawa has nearly 1'000'000 people), but the roll-out of everything was a bit messy.
Every new line has problems. Edmonton has been struggling not unlike Ottawa too.
Cost per mile of light rail is typically ~$100M (USD) /mile
Not sure on exact figure but let's say ION cost $900M.
900/12 = $75M/mile or roughly $55M (USD) /mile
I think compared to a typical American light rail, Waterloo did it quicker (once actual construction started)and much less expensive.
Posts: 581
Threads: 2
Joined: Oct 2017
Reputation:
26
Happy iONversary everyone. It's hard to believe it's already been one year since launch.
Posts: 6,692
Threads: 38
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
117
06-21-2020, 09:47 AM
(06-21-2020, 12:50 AM)bgb_ca Wrote: Happy iONversary everyone. It's hard to believe it's already been one year since launch.
And at least a couple of months since anybody drove their vehicle into one of the trains!
|