Welcome Guest!
In order to take advantage of all the great features that Waterloo Region Connected has to offer, including participating in the lively discussions below, you're going to have to register. The good news is that it'll take less than a minute and you can get started enjoying Waterloo Region's best online community right away.
or Create an Account




Thread Rating:
  • 16 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
ION - Waterloo Region's Light Rail Transit
(11-12-2019, 12:02 AM)panamaniac Wrote:
(11-08-2019, 02:11 PM)KevinL Wrote: It appears we've had our first LRT-bike collision. https://kitchener.ctvnews.ca/bike-and-lr...76505#_gus

Am I correct in understanding that the cyclist is to be charged?

That appears to be the case:
https://www.kitchenertoday.com/police-be...on-1842294
Reply


Faulty LRT arm delays fire officials on way to medical emergency
Reply
(11-12-2019, 02:55 PM)Bob_McBob Wrote: Faulty LRT arm delays fire officials on way to medical emergency
Is there a reason they couldn't zip over to the westbound lanes and take those?  Or was it not an emergency vehicle with its lights on?
Reply
(11-12-2019, 02:40 PM)Coke6pk Wrote:
(11-12-2019, 01:48 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: You have to admit that car drivers have multiple orders of magnitude other routes than every other form of transportation.

You'll also note that the LRT was shut down for far longer than most of the roads were.

Agreed, but car drivers have always had more freedom of mobility compared to public transit.  I realize there is a PITA factor of changing modes to make the detour, but *I* feel it to be an acceptable annoyance.. more so than the same thing happening due to a car vs iOn collision.

I'm not sure why the region shut down the LRT so long.  There were no stands set up, so contact with the wires would seem moot.  IMO, the southbound trains could of ran normal, and the northbound shut from 10:30 - 11:45.... same as car traffic.  [I realize that running S/B trains normally would cause too many trains to be stuck south of the closure... I'm not sure the best logistical answer to this situation]


Coke

I think this is a problem we should solve instead of arguing that "it's fine" because "car drivers can be inconvenienced at times too" when we make it worse through poor planning.

As for the why, I'm not sure, but the region/grandlinq have always been excessively conservative when it comes to the LRT, so perhaps they didn't want it running any time there was anything going on, even prep/teardown.

That being said, a lot of this also relates to poor planning, they couldn't run S/B trains, because they'd have run out of trains (even at ever 15 minutes, all the trains would be south of DTK within about 2-3 hours). What *SHOULD* have been done is the appropriate switches in place to allow trains to reach Central station and reverse, OR switch the NB trains onto the SB tracks to go around DTK.  We knew DTK would be a hot spot for closures, that should have been part of the design.
Reply
(11-12-2019, 11:14 AM)JoeKW Wrote: Does anyone know how the emergency shuttle bus systems work? Where do the drivers come from? Are they on call or pulled off other lines?  Do other lines suffer as a result?  Do we know how long it is between a disruption in service and shuttle service starting up?

GRT knew about this event in advance so they just scheduled extra drivers.
Reply
(11-04-2019, 11:23 PM)panamaniac Wrote:
(11-04-2019, 06:39 PM)KevinL Wrote: The cenotaph is scheduled to be disassembled for restoration soon, so the next couple years may not actually require this.

I have not heard this before.  Is there a source with more info?

Edit:  Part of the plaza renovation, I assume?

It would be nice if it moved to Victoria Park, near the old city hall clock tower.  Plenty of room there.  I thought this was a plan (at one time anyway)?
Reply
(11-12-2019, 06:55 PM)GarthDanlor Wrote:
(11-04-2019, 11:23 PM)panamaniac Wrote: I have not heard this before.  Is there a source with more info?

Edit:  Part of the plaza renovation, I assume?

It would be nice if it moved to Victoria Park, near the old city hall clock tower.  Plenty of room there.  I thought this was a plan (at one time anyway)?

If it was, I've not heard of it.  I would find a location in Victoria Park a bit out "out of the way" for the cenotaph.  I would expect it to be in a very "front and centre" kind of location (the way it used to be ....)
Reply


(11-12-2019, 03:33 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: That being said, a lot of this also relates to poor planning, they couldn't run S/B trains, because they'd have run out of trains (even at ever 15 minutes, all the trains would be south of DTK within about 2-3 hours). What *SHOULD* have been done is the appropriate switches in place to allow trains to reach Central station and reverse, OR switch the NB trains onto the SB tracks to go around DTK.  We knew DTK would be a hot spot for closures, that should have been part of the design.

What is weird is that the system is capable of running in reverse, as we saw during testing. The problem is that the crossovers don’t exist for convenient reverse-running (except for the spur line segment with the freight traffic).
Reply
Update on the pedestrian crossing of University at the LRT: we have previously discussed the fact that the pedestrian signal can be safely permissive while the crossing protection is activated. Today I happened to reach the intersection at about the same time the crossing started activating, and I was walking rather than bicycling so it was convenient to try a couple of experiments.

What I found is that if the pedestrian button is pressed while pedestrians have a red hand, it immediately goes to walking person. If it is pressed during the countdown, the countdown finishes normally and then immediately goes to walking person.

Of course, this is mostly moot because everybody can see it’s perfectly safe because of the train signals, so they just cross against the red, but it’s interesting. Still doesn’t explain why it doesn’t just stay on walking person, but the designers do seem to have integrated the pedestrian signals in a reasonable way given that all pedestrian signals are to be requested by pressing the button.
Reply
(11-12-2019, 09:06 PM)ijmorlan Wrote:
(11-12-2019, 03:33 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: That being said, a lot of this also relates to poor planning, they couldn't run S/B trains, because they'd have run out of trains (even at ever 15 minutes, all the trains would be south of DTK within about 2-3 hours). What *SHOULD* have been done is the appropriate switches in place to allow trains to reach Central station and reverse, OR switch the NB trains onto the SB tracks to go around DTK.  We knew DTK would be a hot spot for closures, that should have been part of the design.

What is weird is that the system is capable of running in reverse, as we saw during testing. The problem is that the crossovers don’t exist for convenient reverse-running (except for the spur line segment with the freight traffic).

I know that trains *can* run reverse, but the crossovers don't exist to allow it to be used in service, then it doesn't have that ability...I have no idea why they didn't think of this.
Reply
(11-12-2019, 09:10 PM)ijmorlan Wrote: Update on the pedestrian crossing of University at the LRT: we have previously discussed the fact that the pedestrian signal can be safely permissive while the crossing protection is activated. Today I happened to reach the intersection at about the same time the crossing started activating, and I was walking rather than bicycling so it was convenient to try a couple of experiments.

What I found is that if the pedestrian button is pressed while pedestrians have a red hand, it immediately goes to walking person. If it is pressed during the countdown, the countdown finishes normally and then immediately goes to walking person.

Of course, this is mostly moot because everybody can see it’s perfectly safe because of the train signals, so they just cross against the red, but it’s interesting. Still doesn’t explain why it doesn’t just stay on walking person, but the designers do seem to have integrated the pedestrian signals in a reasonable way given that all pedestrian signals are to be requested by pressing the button.

Peds are required to beg in our region.
Reply
(11-12-2019, 09:35 PM)danbrotherston Wrote: Peds are required to beg in our region.

Sadly. By “reasonable” I just meant in line with elsewhere in the Region, not that I actually think it’s ideal.

At this particular location I still think it should just be always green for pedestrians except when traffic on University Ave. triggers a sensor to request a green.
Reply
I think this is a poorly designed intersection.

I was at that intersection a month or so back, and noticed that a majority of times the railway crossing gates would go up, the traffic had a red light. There were countless times traffic started moving when the gates lifted, but the light was red.

WR drivers cant figure out to stay out of the LRT's way, how do we expect them to manage two traffic signals at once?

Coke
Reply


(11-13-2019, 12:33 PM)Coke6pk Wrote: I think this is a poorly designed intersection.

I was at that intersection a month or so back, and noticed that a majority of times the railway crossing gates would go up, the traffic had a red light.  There were countless times traffic started moving when the gates lifted, but the light was red. 

WR drivers cant figure out to stay out of the LRT's way, how do we expect them to manage two traffic signals at once?

Coke

I think I described this exact issue at Mill/Ottawa a while back. I wonder if a valid solution for University crossing would be if the train just passed purposely leave the gates down & railway crossing lights flashing a bit longer until the traffic light is ready to change to green...
Reply
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 187 Guest(s)

About Waterloo Region Connected

Launched in August 2014, Waterloo Region Connected is an online community that brings together all the things that make Waterloo Region great. Waterloo Region Connected provides user-driven content fueled by a lively discussion forum covering topics like urban development, transportation projects, heritage issues, businesses and other issues of interest to those in Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge and the four Townships - North Dumfries, Wellesley, Wilmot, and Woolwich.

              User Links