09-10-2018, 09:19 PM
(09-10-2018, 08:48 PM)danbrotherston Wrote:(09-10-2018, 08:28 PM)tomh009 Wrote: I agree. I would like a (more?) proportional electoral system but this is what we have today, and we need to accept that this is how things work.
But the notwithstanding clause was certainly not intended or settling personal grudges with a lower level of government.
But we don't have to accept that this is how things work. We can change how things work. Pointing out that things like this would be prevented with a more proportional system shows exactly why we *should* change how things work.
Oh, I agree that we should change how the elections work, I just don't know how to get it to happen without the governing (majority) party supporting it. (I had some hope that the Liberals would do that on the federal level, but unfortunately that seems to be completely dead.)
But in the meantime, I do think that we should accept that this is how things work now, and that this is our legal electoral system, until such time that we are able to change the system (for something better).